India has dominated the Champions Trophy, marching unbeaten to the final, where it faces New Zealand on Sunday. However, the hybrid model — ensuring all of India’s matches were played in Dubai — has sparked debate among players and experts.
Some call it an undeniable advantage, while others dismiss it as mere excuses. Here’s what they had to say:
The Critics: ‘It’s an Advantage’
Michael Atherton (Former England captain)
“What about the advantage India have in playing only in Dubai? They don’t have to travel between venues or countries, unlike other teams.”
Rassie van der Dussen (South Africa batter)
“If you can stay in one place, train in the same facilities, and play on the same pitches, it’s definitely an advantage.”
David Miller (South Africa batter)
“It’s only a short flight between Pakistan and UAE, but flying out after a game and arriving at 7 AM isn’t ideal.”
The Defenders: ‘No Such Advantage’
Gautam Gambhir (Former India opener)
“Some people are just perpetual cribbers. This is as much a neutral venue for us as it is for others.”
Rajiv Shukla (BCCI Vice President)
“The ICC decided this long ago. India plays on different strips, so there’s no question of fair or unfair play.”
Steve Smith (Australia batter)
“I’m not buying into it. The conditions suit India’s style, but they simply played better.”
The Neutral Take
Nasser Hussain (Former England captain)
“India were smart in their selection. They knew what Dubai would be like and picked spinners accordingly.”
Rob Walter (South Africa coach)
“If we spend energy worrying about disadvantages, we spend less energy on our own game.”